Token Program Proposals (TPPs)

What is a ZK Token Program Proposal (TPP)?

Token Program Proposals (TPPs) include all proposals submitted through the ZKsync Token Governor. Token Programs assign minting and burning rights of ZK tokens to specified capped minters, activating new mechanics to distribute the ZK token. All TPPs should be aligned with these guidelines to help achieve the goals supporting the vision of the ZK Credo.

ℹ️ Learn more about ZKsync strategic priorities by visiting the ZKsync Governance North Star and GAP-1: ZKsync Token Program Priorities 2025 v1.0.

What is a token mechanic?

Token Programs approved by the Token Assembly deploy token mechanics. Token mechanics are smart contracts executing ZK token allocations based on pre-determined, (onchain) verifiable criteria.

ℹ️ Learn more about token mechanics and TPP standards in the TPP FAQ.

What is a capped minter?

Capped minters are unique smart contracts of the ZKsync ecosystem that allow for “just-in-time minting.” Each capped minter is assigned a maximum number of tokens, known as the “cap,” which is allowed to be minted. Those with the minter role of a capped minter can mint tokens from that supply whenever they choose to, up to the maximum specified.

How is this relevant for governance? Unlike other token launches, not all ZK tokens were minted upon the launch of the ZK token. In other words, there is no token treasury. Instead, the Token Assembly grants minting rights to administrators of Token Programs. The Token Assembly has access to 29.3% of the total token supply, as defined during the token launch. This design removes the risks associated with a large treasury and instead helps shift the agency of token management to the final token recipient.

ℹ️ Learn more about the latest version of the capped minter and its functionality.

What information should I include in a TPP?

A ZK Token Program Proposal should include all the necessary information for ZKsync Delegates to make an informed decision and vote on the proposal. The proposal length and detail should align with the scale of the ZK Token mechanic and accountability measures.

All TPPs should include:

  • IMPACT: Describe how the token program will impact one of the ZKsync Governance North Star metrics and what metrics it will use to measure success. Please also reference other guiding documents such as a technical roadmap or annual priorities for the Token Assembly.

  • MECHANIC: Token Programs should deploy self-executing smart-contracts that are designed to distribute tokens autonomously based on predefined conditions or metrics ("mechanics"). Every mechanic should support ZKsync adoption and innovation, and include the following:

    • A token model that describes how the mechanic uses and distributes ZK to achieve the Token Program objectives. Use this as a template to start with: “This TPP deploys a(n) [Mechanic Type] smart-contract supporting [North Star Metric] that allocates ZK tokens based on [Onchain Action Eligibility/Metric]”

    • All allocations, including:

      • Program Rewards: ZK being distributed to qualifying participants

      • Proposal Success Rewards: Token allocations as a reward for code development, code audits, and coordination efforts leading to a successful vote on the proposal.

      • Mechanic Usage Fees: Token allocations necessary to cover the program’s smart contracts fees over the course of the program.

      • Administration: Token allocations related to SteerCo member participation, program monitoring, and other management.

  • PLAN: Outline a long-term project plan (for example 6-months to 2+ years) with outcomes, milestones, and deliverables aligned to the ZKsync Governance North Star, endorsed ZKsync Strategic Priorities, and the ZK Credo.

    • Specify KPIs supporting those outcomes and the overarching vision of the Token Program. Include how those KPIs will be measured (e.g. onchain, elsewhere).

    • Explain the permissionless pathways available for public participation. For example, address questions like: how is the program composable?, what standards does it follow?, will there be a public communication channel?, and what projects are available for contributors?

  • ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK: Specify what methods will hold the program, mechanic, operations, and participants accountable for their commitments. For example, this can include items such as a Steering Committee, Token Streaming Terms, staking, or contracting with ZKGPS (learn more here).

✍️ TEMPLATE: Proposal authors are encouraged to follow the standard proposal template for Token Program Proposals.

ℹ️ NOTE: All documentation should be included in the onchain proposal, or include links to an onchain source such as Arweave, IPFS, etc. This allows the proposal content to be public and accessible across web3 applications.

What onchain actions can I deploy with a TPP?

Delegates need to include the appropriate onchain action in their proposal to successfully connect ZK tokens to a Token Program mechanic. An onchain action is represented by a hexadecimal value known as calldata. The calldata, or executable payload, instructs the ZKsync Token Governor Timelock (further details linked below) to give access to ZK Tokens.

The approval of a Token Program Proposal allows a specified address to mint ZK tokens (up to the capped amount) or mint and directly transfer them to a designated recipient. This is done by granting the MINTER role to the address of a designated capped minter via the Token Governor Timelock.

  • Minter Address Approval (most common): Token Governor acts as MINTER_ADMIN. The Delegate proposer specifies an address, such as a ZkCappedMinter contract, to act as MINTER. A specific agent (individual, entity, or autonomous code) represented by an Ethereum address can then mint tokens via the approved address.

  • Direct Mint: Token Governor Timelock contract acts as MINTER. The Delegate proposer specifies the recipient of the ZK Token (_mintReceiver) and the ZK Token amount (_mintAmount). The Token Governor then mints tokens directly to that address.

For more information about the ZKsyncTokenGovernor, Timelock Contract, and ZK Token, you can visit https://github.com/ZKsync-Association.

ℹ️ Proposals will be removed from the ZKsync Governance Portal if they enable access to ZK tokens by prohibited addresses, including those associated with sanctioned entities, individuals, or jurisdictions, as well as addresses linked to illicit activities like fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, or other criminal enterprises.

Onchain Action Example 1: Minter Address Approval for up to 100 ZK tokens

Minter Address Approvals are expected to be the most common method to access ZK tokens. Minter Address Approvals allow specific mechanics to mint tokens on demand. By minting on demand, mechanics reduce dependencies on custodial services. Minting on demand can also have other benefits, such as reducing security risks, ensuring that the tokens have a clean history, and allowing recipients to choose the time and place of minting, which may help them clarify the tax treatment of their tokens.

Example Proposal:

  1. Alice submits a Token Program Proposal for Minter Address Approval. If the proposal is approved, then “MechanicManager can Mint a maximum of 100 ZK”

    1. ZKTokenGovernor-Timelock acts as MINTER_ADMIN for ZK token contract (ZKtokenV2.sol)

    2. Mechanic_ZKCappedMinter is set as MINTER role of ZKtokenV2.sol

    3. MechanicManager is set as ADMIN of Mechanic_ZKCappedMinter

      1. Note: Capped Minter has immutable Cap, which cannot be changed by ADMIN or any other party

  2. Alice's Token Program Proposal has calldata that:

    1. Calls _grantRole on ZKtokenV2.sol

    2. Assigns MINTER_ROLE to Mechanic_ZKCappedMinter

      1. The Mechanic_ZKCappedMinter is a separate smart contract deployed prior to proposal submission. To ensure quality of the smart contract, Mechanic_ZKCappedMinter bytecode hash should match https://github.com/zksync-association/zk-governance/blob/master/l2-contracts/src/ZkCappedMinterV2.sol. An example can be viewed on the ZKsync Block Explorer, using the deployment logs which specify the ContractDeployed event with bytecodeHash of 0x0100007911f29707ff4a93ecdc84a682cbc3969469865c43bb233b35c3068b24

      2. The Mechanic_ZKCappedMinter parameters would be set as follows for this proposal:

        1. TOKEN = [ZK Token Contract];

        2. ADMIN = MechanicManager;

        3. CAP = 100;

  3. If Alice's proposal passes, then MechanicManager can mint 100 ZK tokens through the Mechanic_ZKCappedMinter after the proposal transaction is executed onchain.

Onchain Action Example 2: Direct mint of 100 ZK tokens

Direct minting should be used if the mechanic requires ZK tokens to be immediately minted. For example, a novel Token Program Proposal may require staked ZK tokens at inception, or swapping ZK tokens for another digital asset immediately upon proposal approval.

Example Proposal:

  1. Alice submits a Token Program Proposal for Direct mint. If the proposal is approved, then “MechanicManager receives 100 ZK”

    1. ZKTokenGovernor-Timelock acts as MINTER for ZKtokenV2.sol

  2. Alice's Token Program Proposal has calldata that:

    1. Sets _mintReceiver as MechanicManager

    2. Sets _mintAmount to 100

    3. Calls _mint(_mintReceiver, _mintAmount)

  3. If Alice's proposal passes, then MechanicManager receives 100 ZK tokens when the proposal is executed.

  4. Should Alice be assigned the ADMIN role of the MechanicManager, then Alice can manage funds as specified in the MechanicManager.

ℹ️ If you need support drafting the executable proposal code for your proposal, please reach out to the ZKsync Association for support at forum.zknation.io.

Token Program Cancellation

A Token Program can be cancelled by the Token Assembly or the Token Program manager if the program is not performing as expected. If a Token Program is to be cancelled by program managers or the Token Assembly at any point before the end of the program, disbursements for work-to-date should be made at the discretion of the program managers before they lose access to minting rights. After necessary tokens have been minted and distributed to cover outstanding program payments, the capped minters will be deactivated in one of the following two ways:

  • Cancellation by program manager: Upon decision to cancel the program, the program manager is responsible for the final distribution of disbursements for work-to-date within a reasonable timeframe. After all necessary tokens have been minted and distributed, the capped minters will be destroyed by sending admin rights of relevant capped minters to a burn address. There should not be any unallocated minted tokens from any of the capped minters.

  • Cancellation by Token Assembly: The Token Assembly may cancel the Token Program by passing a TPP on the Token Governor to revoke the minter role from all capped minters related to the given Token Program. In the event that the Token Program is cancelled by the Token Assembly, by passing a proposal to remove the minter role from all capped minters, the program manager is responsible for making any necessary final distributions of disbursements for work-to-date prior to the end of the timelock period for the relevant cancellation proposal. Upon execution of the proposal no further tokens will be able to be distributed as part of the given Token Program.

ℹ️ All minted tokens from any capped minter in relation to a Token Program need to be allocated as specified, as they cannot be sent back to the Token Assembly.

Proposal Process/Timeline

Please refer to the Token Governor Proposal Process for a detailed outline of the TPP process and timeline.

Other Frequently Asked Questions

Are token programs the right channel to ask for grants?

Token programs are intended to be for mobilizing large and long-term mechanics, not grants. In other words, token programs should launch self-executing smart contract designed to distribute tokens autonomously based on predefined conditions or metrics. If you have an idea for a grant, transform it into a ZK token mechanic supporting a specific ZKsync goal and KPI.

What tools are available for token mechanics?

The ZK token is an ERC20 token and is compatible with common web3 tools. To better understand the possibilities in autonomous token flows, you can connect with organizations such as:

ℹ️ You can also check out the TPP Builders section of forum.zknation.io for more potential technical tools and partners for token mechanic development.

Last updated